<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Web Conferencing Blog &#187; user-friendliness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.webconferencing-test.com/tag/user-friendliness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.webconferencing-test.com</link>
	<description>The Blog of Online Meeting Tools Review</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 14:10:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>LiveOn shows promise but doesn’t make it into our ranking</title>
		<link>http://blog.webconferencing-test.com/2011/07/21/liveon-shows-promise-but-doesn%e2%80%99t-make-it-into-our-ranking/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.webconferencing-test.com/2011/07/21/liveon-shows-promise-but-doesn%e2%80%99t-make-it-into-our-ranking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 18:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online meeting tools review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[screen sharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user-friendliness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whiteboard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webconferencing-test.com/blog/?p=716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Japanese vendor LiveOn asked us to test their online meeting solution. At the risk of spoiling the suspense: The tool didn’t make it into our ranking. But let us start at the beginning. The basic functionalities are all there and if we had to choose the scenario this solution is best suited for we’d [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Japanese vendor LiveOn asked us to test their online meeting solution. At the risk of spoiling the suspense: The tool didn’t make it into our ranking.</p>
<p>But let us start at the beginning. The basic functionalities are all there and if we had to choose the scenario this solution is best suited for we’d say it definitely is online meetings planned in advance. Video is the central aspect of the solution, displaying the participant’s webcam streams in the main window. Functionalities such as whiteboard and screen sharing can be added in separate windows.</p>
<p>Now to the shortcomings… The tool runs on Windows only which really is a large restriction as we pointed out earlier – <a title="Mac users are being neglected" href="http://www.webconferencing-test.com/blog/2011/04/21/mac-users-are-being-neglected-by-web-conferencing-vendors/" target="_blank">“Mac users are being neglected”</a>. There are neither one-click meetings nor recurring meetings, and you can only enter a meeting room at the time the meeting is scheduled, no earlier. When we started our meeting it took us 8 minutes from clicking “enter room” to actually arriving in the room. Finally, there was no pricing information posted on the website.</p>
<p>User-friendliness and meeting-setup are the two major areas for improvement. The solution shows promise, but currently cannot be considered a serious alternative to the market leaders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.webconferencing-test.com/2011/07/21/liveon-shows-promise-but-doesn%e2%80%99t-make-it-into-our-ranking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ClickMeeting effortlessly becomes one of the ten best web conferencing solutions available</title>
		<link>http://blog.webconferencing-test.com/2011/03/25/clickmeeting-effortlessly-becomes-one-of-the-ten-best-web-conferencing-solutions-available/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.webconferencing-test.com/2011/03/25/clickmeeting-effortlessly-becomes-one-of-the-ten-best-web-conferencing-solutions-available/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 16:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online meeting tools review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ClickMeeting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user-friendliness]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webconferencing-test.com/blog/?p=660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We usually don’t expect too much of a web conferencing solution when we run our initial tests, since most tools don’t live up to our standards. So finding a gem such as ClickMeeting is quite an exception. The intuitive user interface and the overall user friendliness are a big plus. But ClickMeeting offers more than [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We usually don’t expect too much of a web conferencing solution when we run our initial tests, since most tools don’t live up to our standards. So finding a gem such as ClickMeeting is quite an exception.</p>
<p>The intuitive user interface and the overall user friendliness are a big plus. But ClickMeeting offers more than only good looks. Sharing content with attendees couldn’t be much easier, as this screenshot demonstrates:</p>
<div id="attachment_662" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://www.webconferencing-test.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/110315_ClickMeeting_sharing_options_web1.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-662" title="110315_ClickMeeting_sharing_options_web" src="http://www.webconferencing-test.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/110315_ClickMeeting_sharing_options_web1-300x189.jpg" alt="ClickMeeting presentation options" width="300" height="189" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">ClickMeeting presentation options</p></div>
<p>ClickMeeting didn’t make it into the top 5, though, and that for a reason. You cannot switch mouse or keyboard control, so your options of truly collaborating are limited.</p>
<p>But still the whole package is very convincing, and ClickMeeting – previously not featured in our ranking – immediately jumps to number eight. Read our detailed evaluation of the tool <a title="Evaluation of Clickmeeting" href="http://www.webconferencing-test.com/en/webconference_home.html?solution=72#sol72" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.webconferencing-test.com/2011/03/25/clickmeeting-effortlessly-becomes-one-of-the-ten-best-web-conferencing-solutions-available/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dimdim 5.5 boasts a number of useful enhancements</title>
		<link>http://blog.webconferencing-test.com/2010/05/07/dimdim-5-5-boasts-a-number-of-useful-enhancements/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.webconferencing-test.com/2010/05/07/dimdim-5-5-boasts-a-number-of-useful-enhancements/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 08:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online meeting tools review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad hoc invitations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dimdim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[screen sharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user-friendliness]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webconferencing-test.com/blog/?p=256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new release can actually bring improvements. Dimdim’s ease of use has really been spiced up. Screen sharing is now possible with a single mouse click. Ad hoc invitations via mail or chat are also effortless, all it takes is a little plug-in that needs to be installed locally. A meeting-independent URL is another new [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new release can actually bring improvements. Dimdim’s ease of use has really been spiced up. Screen sharing is now possible with a single mouse click. Ad hoc invitations via mail or chat are also effortless, all it takes is a little plug-in that needs to be installed locally.</p>
<p>A meeting-independent URL is another new feature which didn’t convince us, though. It does allow attendees to quickly join meetings, but the host has less control over who is actually attending. The new “action” buttons that have been included on Dimdim’s online portal are also a wee bit too large, but hey, they do get your attention.</p>
<p>More about Dimdim <a title="Evaluation Dimdim 5.5" href="http://www.webconferencing-test.com/en/webconference_home.html?solution=7#sol7" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.webconferencing-test.com/2010/05/07/dimdim-5-5-boasts-a-number-of-useful-enhancements/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BeamYourScreen makes a huge leap – from rank 18 to 6</title>
		<link>http://blog.webconferencing-test.com/2010/03/05/beamyourscreen-makes-a-huge-leap-%e2%80%93-from-rank-18-to-6/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.webconferencing-test.com/2010/03/05/beamyourscreen-makes-a-huge-leap-%e2%80%93-from-rank-18-to-6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 12:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online meeting tools review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BeamYourScreen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user-friendliness]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webconferencing-test.com/blog/?p=206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well done! After re-evaluating BeamYourScreen, which is now available in version 3.0, we found great improvements in ease of installation, structure, and security. The missing chat function is a big turnoff though. Still, if the overall trend is carried on with future developments, BeamYourScreen might very well find itself in our top 5 after the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done! After re-evaluating BeamYourScreen, which is now available in version 3.0, we found great improvements in ease of installation, structure, and security. The missing chat function is a big turnoff though. Still, if the overall trend is carried on with future developments, BeamYourScreen might very well find itself in our top 5 after the next evaluation.</p>
<p>Check out the complete test results <a title="Evaluation BeamYourScreen" href="http://www.webconferencing-test.com/en/webconference_home.html?solution=21#sol21" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.webconferencing-test.com/2010/03/05/beamyourscreen-makes-a-huge-leap-%e2%80%93-from-rank-18-to-6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>User-friendliness of web conferencing tools</title>
		<link>http://blog.webconferencing-test.com/2010/02/01/user-friendliness-of-web-conferencing-tools/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.webconferencing-test.com/2010/02/01/user-friendliness-of-web-conferencing-tools/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 15:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web conferencing fundamentals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cisco WebEx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GoToAssist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GoToMeeting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GoToMyPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GoToTraining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GoToWebinar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user-friendliness]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webconferencing-test.com/blog/?p=172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As is clearly visible in our evaluations of online meeting solutions, user-friendliness weighs in heavily. And for good reason too, because if you want to present information online or have a virtual team-meeting you can’t waste time trying to figure out how to get a specific gadget to work. Meeting organizers and participants need easy-to-use [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As is clearly visible in our evaluations of online meeting solutions, user-friendliness weighs in heavily. And for good reason too, because if you want to present information online or have a virtual team-meeting you can’t waste time trying to figure out how to get a specific gadget to work. Meeting organizers and participants need easy-to-use software to operate quickly and smoothly.</p>
<p>User-friendliness does not mean – at least for us – hoarding functionalities in one tool. We favor the less-is-more approach to web conferencing. Packing loads of functionalities into one tool may make for a powerful software, but it takes time and effort to learn to operate it properly (e.g. WebEx). Splitting services into multiple tools with only a limited number of features gives the user an easy-to-use solution for his requirements (e.g. Citrix GoToMeeting, <a title="GoToWebinar" href="http://www.dpbolvw.net/click-2183252-10445511" target="_blank">GoToWebinar</a>, GoToAssist, GoToMyPC, and GoToTraining)</p>
<p>More details on our criteria for evaluation can be found on our <a title="Evaluation criteria" href="http://www.webconferencing-test.com/en/webconferencing_test_approach.html" target="_blank">homepage</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.webconferencing-test.com/2010/02/01/user-friendliness-of-web-conferencing-tools/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

